John Rawls , Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, 2000.
約翰·羅爾斯:《道德哲學(xué)史講義》,哈佛大學(xué)出版社, 2000年.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
Then Rawls argues, if all you have is formal equality.
然后羅爾斯?fàn)庌q, 如果你擁有的只是形式上的平等.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
Rawls'theory was well - knit . Nevertheless, it has its difficulties.
羅爾斯的理論盡管周到細(xì)致, 但仍存在一些內(nèi)在的困境.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
Effort, you know what Rawls's answer to that is?
努力, 你們知道羅爾斯如何回應(yīng) 嗎 ?
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
That's one challenge that has been put to Rawls.
這是一種對于羅爾斯的挑戰(zhàn).
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
John Rawls offers a detailed answer to that question.
約翰·羅爾斯提供了一份該問題的詳細(xì)答案.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
John Rawls s thought of rational compromise grasps the times characteristic.
羅爾斯的理性妥協(xié)思想把握了時代特點.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
Rawls " theory of procedure justice is a pure procedure justice. "
羅爾斯 的程序正義理論是一種純粹的程序正義.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
Examine the moral issue in terms of the two principles of Rawls.
以羅爾斯的兩大原理檢驗道德爭議.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
Aristotle disagrees with Kant and Rawls.
亞里士多德不同意康德和羅爾斯.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
And Rawls says, on reflection, we don't.
而羅爾斯說, 在深思熟慮后, 我們會發(fā)現(xiàn),其實我們并不.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
Then why, Rawls says, of course not.
這就是為什么, 羅爾斯說, 當(dāng)然不是.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
That's the question that Rawls's difference principle poses.
這就是羅爾斯的差異原則所陳述的問題.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
Rawls argues, are lead to embrace a system of fair equality of opportunity.
羅爾斯稱, 他們轉(zhuǎn)而擁護一種公平的機會均等的系統(tǒng).
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
In this text Rawls describes the history of his religious beliefs and attitudes towards religion.
在這個文本中,羅爾斯描述了他的宗教信仰史和他對宗教的態(tài)度.
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)